You are viewing [info]stacia_kane's journal

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Nobody's going to do it for you

  • Oct. 3rd, 2007 at 9:00 AM
newme
So as I come up for air, on my last free day this week (because tomorrow is Faerie's first day at nursery, and I will be holed up here on the couch finishing The Demon Inside, which I expect to have done by the time I go to bed Friday night pleasegods), I wander around the internets. (In between bouts of inspecting my daughters' hair. She's home again today for a final delousing.)

Everyone and their brothers are gearing up for NaNoWriMo, something I've never done or cared about, and actually think can be counterproductive (yes, Anton, I'm running with it). I mean, if you want to do it and enjoy it, that's fine. But you shouldn't need that kind of encouragement to write a book. You shouldn't need bells and whistles and pistols firing at the starting line and constant vigilance to get your book done. You should have the discipline to do it no matter what month it is, and you should remember that NaNo? Not a prerequisite to writing. So many people seem to have it in their head that NaNo is some kind of official thing. It's not. There's no prize for the winner (No, don't use "NaNo winner" on your queries). It's just a website, just an idea some guy came up with. You don't need to come up with the idea for your book in July and wait until November to start because that's the time to write.

I'm just very uncomfortable with the idea of encouraging people to think certain conditions need to be in place before you can write, that it has to be a particular time of year or you need to chart your progress or whatever. You know what you need in order to write?

*an idea
*a writing implement

That's it.

So don't get the idea in your head that NaNo is the only time you can write a book, because that's preposterous (see? I can use big words).

I don't think NaNo is necessarily a bad program. But I don't think it's the be-all end-all either, and I think it can harm new writers. (Also, 50k words is not a novel.)

You know what else you need? A sense of your own story and what you want. I've been having some issues with this lately. You know that as a rule I don't give writing advice. I certainly don't think I've reached the level of skill and fame that means people would want to take my words to heart.

But you know what? There's another reason I don't give a lot of advice, and it's this: Nobody can do it for you. Nobody can give you the secret of writing good characters or strong stories. Nobody can tell you how to make your story work. Nobody can tell you what story you should be writing (obviously, with some exceptions, because your editors can tell you whatever they want, but we're talking about other writers.) Show up somewhere--a writer's forum, an email loop, a blog, and start saying things like, "How do I make this character work?" or "How do I get people to want to read my book?" and expect that you'll get an answer like, "Write it well."

There is no magic bullet for writing. There's no puzzle box or computer that will spit the words out in perfect order and create sympathetic, quirky, adorable characters who also do martial arts or whatever it is you want. That's not going to happen. You have to do it yourself. And I'm tired of seeing people give that advice--or giving it myself--and getting pissy replies in return, like "But that doesn't help me. I want to know HOW."

The answer to that is the same as it is for every other writing question. Read a lot. Write a lot. Write the story you want to write. repeat quite a few times. Nobody is going to hand you the golden key, you need to work hard and find it yourself. So if you're going to ask other people to basically do your work for you and then get pissy with them when they take time away from their own work to try and help you, bugger off and stop wasting both of our time.

Damn, I'm grumpy today, what's up with that?

Comments

( 11 people said — Say something )
[info]naomi_jay wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 10:57 am (UTC)
I think you're absolutely right about "nobody can do it for you," and I do think that NaNo could be counterproductive for new writers.

Having said, I've signed up because I want to see if I can actually write 50k in a month - a personal challenge. The last novel I completed took me over a year. Given that I type very fast, that seems ridiculous to me. I want to make writing my career, and that means pushing myself a little bit more than I currently do. Doing NaNo will hopefully get me back into the habit of writing every single day, regardless of my mood.
[info]stacia_kane wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 11:46 am (UTC)
Oh, don't get me wrong. I think it can be a fun exercise for some people, and I think more experienced authors who get too caught up in Ye Old Internal Editor's Dictates could benefit from the "just sit there and type" philosophy.

But yes, for new writers I think it can be very unhelpful.
[info]yeyo_x wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 12:21 pm (UTC)
Lack of caffeine? Lack of sex? That time of the month? All of the above?

I'm having a bit of a grumpy week although I don't really feel grumpy. People just think I am.
[info]stacia_kane wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 03:26 pm (UTC)
Hmm. Lack of sleep, maybe. I think I'm just irritated I didn't finish my book yet. Soon...I can't wait.

Isn't that odd? I get that too, where I feel fine but Stephen keeps saying "You look mad, what's wrong" or whatever.
[info]antonstrout wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 01:10 pm (UTC)
Everytime I see the word preposterous now, I think of the Flight of the Conchords rap song "Hiphopopotamus vs. Rhymenocerous" and this verse:
They call me the Hiphopopotamus
Flows that glow like phosphorous
Poppin’ off the top of this esophagus
Rockin’ this metropolis
I’m not a large water-dwelling mammal
Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis?
Did Steve tell you that, perchance?
Steve.

Oh, and your post spells it all out better... I was just sick of everyone squeeing about it coming up and I just hit a wall after the nth post.

And you didn't pimp my NaNoWriDailiDeco!
[info]rhonawestbrook wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 01:49 pm (UTC)
I am ashamed to admit how deeply I agree with both of you.
[info]stacia_kane wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 03:27 pm (UTC)
Ashamed? Why?
[info]rhonawestbrook wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 03:32 pm (UTC)
Cuz of Anton's Hippo!!!!!!

::giggles:::
[info]stacia_kane wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 03:27 pm (UTC)
Sorry, Anton. I should have linked to you on that one.


I have a Pez dispenser shaped like a witch.
[info]calendula_witch wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 04:02 pm (UTC)
I totally agree, that the key to writing is to, well, write. As you said, as Stephen King said: Read a lot, write a lot.

Yet I did NaNo for the first time last year, and it was fabulous for me. My first novel took a year just for the bloated first draft; then another year in revisions, and I could still tinker with it today. My NaNo novel got to about 65K in November; I added a few scenes in December, sent it through two crit groups. It's now 80K and ready to query.

But beyond the productivity, NaNo was FUN. I went on a retreat; I went to write-ins; I met a ton of local writers who are still friends (and that's how I got into my second crit group). So NaNo is a great thing if you want some structure and community around your writing.

But, the bottom line is, as you say: you, alone, with the computer or quill pen or whatever. Your brain and the blank page/screen/stone tablet. And repeat. :-)
[info]dracschick wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 12:49 am (UTC)
*hugs*
feel better and do take care,
Chris

PS--Whatever gets 'em to write is good to me.
( 11 people said — Say something )

Latest Month

March 2012
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by [info]chasethestars